Additional legislation introduced in US seeks revision of Section 232

A group of US lawmakers introduced legislation that would require the US Department of Defense to justify the national security basis for new tariffs under Section 232 and increase congressional oversight of that process.

The legislation seeks to reform Section 232 to better align the statute with its original intent as a trade remedy tool for the president and Congress to respond to genuine threats to national security, Senator Rob Portman (Republican, Ohio), one of the co-sponsors of the bill, said in a statement on Wednesday February 6.

“I have repeatedly expressed concerns about the misuse of the Section 232 statute to impose tariffs on automobiles and auto parts, and its impact on Ohio jobs and the US economy as a whole. This bipartisan legislation preserves this trade tool while properly placing the national security designation at the Department of Defense and expanding the role of Congress in the process,” Portman said.

Senators Doug Jones (Democrat, Alabama), Joni Ernst (Republican, Iowa), Lamar Alexander (Republican, Tennessee), Dianne Feinstein (Democrat, California), Deb Fischer (Republican, Nebraska), Kyrsten Sinema (Democrat, Arizona) and Todd Young (Republican, Indiana) also backed the new bill.

Blanket tariffs of 25% on steel imports and 10% on aluminium imports were implemented against shipments from most countries last March, and applied against typical allies Canada, Mexico and the European Union on June 1, 2018.

Fastmarkets AMM’s daily US Midwest HRC index, which stood at $34.15 per hundredweight ($683 per short ton) as of February 6, had reached a nearly 10-year peak of $45.84 per cwt last July compared with $40.03 per cwt in early March and $32.63 per cwt at the start of 2018.

Defense versus Commerce
The newly introduced legislation would revise the Section 232 statute to ensure that any Section 232 actions are based on a national security determination by the Defense Department and to give Congress a larger role in the Section 232 process.

National security was broadly defined in the March 2018 presidential proclamations on the Section 232 tariffs, which contended that imports pose a threat to the United States because they “weaken our internal economy.”

The new bill would divide the existing Section 232 process into an investigation phase, led by Defense, and a remedy phase, led by the Department of Commerce. It also calls for Defense, not Commerce, to justify the national security basis for new tariffs.

And the bill would expand the process whereby Congress can disapprove of a Section 232 action by passing a joint resolution of disapproval. It also requires consultation with Congress throughout the Section 232 process.

The Trade Security Act is not the first attempt by the legislative branch to limit President Donald Trump’s ability to impose unilateral import tariffs.

Last week, legislation was introduced that would require approval from Congress before Trump could take any trade action, including implementing tariffs and quotas under Section 232. That bill also called for a clear definition of national security, and for Section 232 investigations to be restricted to goods with applications in military equipment, energy resources and/or critical infrastructure.

In mid-January, two Senators reintroduced legislation that would delay the imposition of additional Section 232 tariffs on US imports of automobiles and automotive parts. Last June, another bill was sponsored that would require the president to get approval from Congress before levying tariffs.

And other groups have filed lawsuits challenging the constitutionality of the existing Section 232 tariffs.

Many countries responded to the Section 232 action by setting retaliatory duties against US exports and filing complaints with the World Trade Organization.

Various groups have called for removal of the Section 232 tariffs against Canada and Mexico, arguing that the duties have resulted in rising supply chain costs across business sectors.

What to read next
he decision to amend the date of publication follows overwhelmingly positive feedback during the 30-day consultation period, which began on February 7 and ended on March 7, 2025. Previously, the five stainless scrap price assessments were settled on the 10th of each calendar month in line with the publication deadline for the US ferrous scrap settlement, […]
Fastmarkets typically settles these markets on or before the 10th of the month, but will be delaying publication due to delays in settlements. The markets not settled by Monday include: To provide feedback on this notice, please contact Amy Hinton by email at pricing@fastmarkets.com. Please add the subject heading: “FAO: Amy Hinton, re: scrap prices.” Please […]
The consultation, which is open until Friday April 4, seeks to ensure that our audited methodologies and price specifications continue to reflect the physical markets for in compliance with the IOSCO principles for PRAs. This includes all elements of our pricing process, our price specifications and publication frequency. The prices subject to this review are […]
MB-CO-0004 Cobalt alloy grade, in-whs Rotterdam, $/lb MB-CO-0005 Cobalt standard grade, in-whs Rotterdam, $/lb These prices are a part of the Fastmarkets minor metals package. Additionally, the publication of Fastmarkets’ MB-CO-0023 cobalt hydroxide, min 30% Co, inferred, China price for Monday March 10 was delayed because of an administrative error. Fastmarkets’ pricing database has been updated. MB-CO-0023 cobalt […]
Liontown Resources is turning its mind to dealmaking to expand its focus beyond its Kathleen Valley lithium mine in Australia, the company’s chief executive officer told Fastmarkets.
The publication of the affected price was delayed for 19 minutes. The following assessment was affected:MB-AL-0004 Aluminium P1020A premium, in-whs dp Rotterdam, $/tonne These prices are a part of the Fastmarkets’ base metals package. For more information or to provide feedback on the delayed publication of this price or if you would like to provide price […]