Combatting the threat of ‘dirty’ imports with a carbon tariff: Circular Steel Summit

The biggest threat to keeping carbon emissions low in the steel industry is imports flowing in from regions where there is a lack of focus on emissions reduction, Kevin Dempsey, president and chief executive officer of the American Iron and Steel Institute, said at Fastmarkets’ second annual Circular Steel Summit on Wednesday January 15 in Houston, Texas

“These regions are… just making steel the cheapest, and perhaps the dirtiest way possible, and then dumping excess production in open markets like the United States,” Dempsey told Fastmarkets’ Americas steel editor Dan Hilliard in a fireside chat on Wednesday.

To combat the cheaper and “dirtier” steel coming from abroad, progress on sustainability has to be paired with aggressive and effective trade policy to ensure that the industry’s investments are not undercut by foreign material coming into the domestic market.

The steel industry in the US is at the forefront when it comes to the lowest emissions among the major steel-producing countries, demonstrating that the industry sees that as good business, Dempsey said.

Developing a domestic carbon tariff

Exploring the potential of the US developing a trade policy linked to carbon emissions, Dempsey highlighted the need for a trade policy tool that considers the differential in carbon emissions intensity between domestic production and imports.

“There should be a tariff assessed to [the higher emission intensity abroad] to level the playing field and to create an incentive for other countries to do what we’re already doing, which is invest in cleaner steel production,” Dempsey said.

A form of carbon tariff in the US is unlikely to look like the EU’s Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM), Demsey said, and the US is likely to take a more market-based approach than a tax-focused approach.

Looking ahead, Dempsey told conference attendees that there will be an increase in the utilization of direct-reduced iron to reduce iron ore and, in the longer term, that companies will start pursuing the use of hydrogen as a reductant to reduce carbon emissions.

The incoming Donald Trump administration will likely focus on trade enforcement and the use of tariffs as a critical economic policy tool, although the specifics of the trade policies are still unknown, Dempsey said.

Trump implemented Section 232 in 2018, imposing a 25% tariff on steel imports. In his presidential campaign in 2024, Trump was vocal about imposing tariffs on imports coming from Mexico and Canada.

USMCA needs further work, data transparency vital

The US-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA), which is up for review in 2026, needs further work, Dempsey said, highlighting the need to clamp down with circumvention and evasion of trade laws.

“We do have folks in Mexico, in certain industries that are importing a lot of product from China, from Russia, and then further processing it, calling it Mexican, to bring it into it into the United States,” Dempsey said.

The Joe Biden administration imposed in July a “melt and pour” requirement for imports of steel from Mexico that were made elsewhere, in a bid to curb trans-shipment and excess production.

One of the hurdles deterring the flow of Chinese and other foreign steel through Mexico is a lack of data transparency, Dempsey told conference attendees.

“The first thing you need is better data and transparency so that the industry and governments can work together to address the problem. We’re going to need a better, stronger, more cooperative relationship with both Mexico and Canada,” the CEO said.

You can understand the critical forces impacting steel news and steel price movements with our reliable data-driven insights, market-reflective prices, forecasts and analysis. Discover steel news, forecasts and 1,500 prices in one space with Fastmarkets.

What to read next
The Trump administration has introduced reciprocal tariffs, matching about half the rates imposed by US trade partners, with a minimum of 10%, to boost domestic industries and achieve "economic independence." While praised by US steel manufacturers for protecting jobs, the effect on trade relationships with partners like Canada and Mexico remains uncertain.
In the second of a two-part series, Fastmarkets looks at opportunities for the Asia ferro-alloys sector that could result from US-China trade tensions or against a backdrop of greater trade protection, ahead of the Asia Ferroalloys 2025 Conference
As US-China trade tensions intensify, Fastmarkets outlines the key challenges and opportunities for the Asian ferro-alloys sector ahead of the Asia Ferroalloys 2025 Conference.
The 2025 executive order on U.S. mineral production is a major step toward strengthening domestic supply chains and national security. By boosting domestic mineral production, it aims to reduce reliance on imports and ensure a secure future for critical industries. This order will shape the future of U.S. mining and its role in global markets.
The United States is taking steps to strengthen its critical mineral supply. This move focuses on boosting domestic production, improving supply chains, and addressing regulatory challenges. These efforts aim to enhance economic growth and reinforce national security.
US aluminium tariffs have far-reaching effects on prices across key industries, from construction and automotive to aerospace. These changes shape costs and influence business operations nationwide.